Grow Strong, Live Long Fitness Study with Elderly Retirement Home Independent Living Residents

By Ty Sevin, Sep 01, 2021

< Back to A Variety of Research on the Benefits of Strength Training in Older Adults

Robert Simons, PhD., CHES, MS, Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay, Saint Petersburg, Florida

Objectives

This study sought to determine changes in functional ability, muscle strength, joint flexibility, and health knowledge after 16 weeks of exercise interventions. Sixty-four (45 women and 19 men) physician-cleared, sedentary, elderly volunteers (average age 84) were randomly assigned to a non-exercising control group or one of two exercise groups, strength training (ST) or cardiovascular training (CT). The ST group trained 2x’s per week at 75% of 1RM, performing 1 set of 10 repetitions on six different Keiser strength training machines. When 10 repetitions were completed with proper form for 3-5 consecutive sessions the weight load was increased by 5 percent. The CT group walked an average of two exercise sessions per week at an intensity set by each individual’s 880 yard walk “pre-test” score. All participants were strongly encouraged to attend health lectures given approximately every 3 weeks. Subjects in all three groups were assessed for functional ability before and after a 16-week intervention, using the AAHPERD Functional Fitness Assessment for Adults Over the Age of 60 Years. Additional assessments included 1RM strength using Keiser equipment, joint flexibility using a mechanical goniometer, and health knowledge using the Fast-Simons Senior Adult Health Knowledge Test.

Results

The ST group improved an average of 33% in strength, 18% in coordination, 14% in agility, 7% in endurance, 10% in flexibility, and 13% in health knowledge. The CT group improved an average of 12% in strength, 13% in coordination, 9% in agility, 6% in endurance, 11% in flexibility and 15% in health knowledge. The control group improved an average of 12% in strength, 13% in coordination, 2% in flexibility and 16% in health knowledge, but exhibited a 21% decline in agility and a 6% decline in endurance. All groups showed a 1% improvement in the Ponderal index. The subjects also reported improvements in quality of life indicators (social inter-activeness, energy levels and mood).

Summary

This study shows that a 16 week exercise intervention of strength training or walking results in significant improvement in physical function of elderly men and women aged 66 to 96 years when compared with a non-exercising control group. Strength training is more effective at improving strength, coordination and agility than walking. Strength training increased lower body strength by 38% overall and upper body strength by 21.3% overall. Improvements in strength, endurance, coordination, agility and flexibility translate into improvements in functional independence of 14% for the strength training group and 9% for the walking group. The author also reported a 61 percent decrease in the incidence of falls. Other significant quality of life benefits appear to result from elderly residents engaging in a regular exercise program.The data revealed that changes in absolute and relative RMR in response to ST are not significantly influenced by age, but they are influenced by gender. In fact, the 7% increase in RMR of all groups when pooled is due largely to the 9% increase in RMR attributed to men only. In addition, the changes in FFM appear similar in both genders. Finally, this study showed that young and older men and women do not show an increase in EEPA outside of the ST sessions. The authors suggest that the difference in RMR between genders may be due to sympathetic nervous system adaptations.

Discussion

This study has important implications for understanding the cost/benefits of strength training programs in senior housing. It is estimated that every point increase in a residents functional independence score (FIM) reduces cost of care by 50 cents a day (Wescott, 2000). A 14% gain in functional ability therefore could represent a cost of care reduction of $7.00 per day. Multiplying this by the 21 subjects in the strength-training group equals a daily cost-of-care reduction of $147.00. On a yearly basis this equals $53,655, far more than the cost of strength training programs. Cost savings associated with reduced falls can also be very significant. Exercise programs geared toward improving the physical function of older adults should include strength training, and further studies need to be done to solidify the link between changes in functional independence scores and cost savings.

Keiser Equipment Used

Leg Extension, Leg Curl, Leg Press, Upper Back, Chest Press, Lower Back

Published in Medical Science Sports & Exercise, 2001 Apr;33(4):532-41

About the author

Ty Sevin

Director of Human Performance, Education and Research

Articles by Ty Sevin >

With over 25 years of coaching experience at both the collegiate and Olympic levels, Ty Sevin is one of the most influential track and field coaches in the country. Ty has worked for the United States Olympic Committee, serving as the Director of the Track and Field Residency Program at the USOC Olympic Training Center in Chula Vista, CA. He has also served as an assistant coach for Team USA on three separate occasions, for both the men’s and women’s teams. Ty himself was a four-time U.S. Olympics Trials qualifier in javelin. Ty most recently spent four years as the Associate Head Coach at the University of Texas at Austin for both the men’s and women’s track and field teams. Prior to that, he led the men’s and women’s track and cross-country teams at the University of New Orleans and McNeese State.

Currently, Ty applies his vast industry experience to the role of Director of Human Performance, Research and Education for Keiser Corporation, where he consults with college and professional sports teams regarding the utilization of Keiser strength equipment. He is also responsible for creating educational curriculum relating to human performance and overseeing Keiser research projects