Does Strength Training Inhibit Gains in Range of Motion from Flexibility Training in Older Adults?

By Ty Sevin, Sep 01, 2021

< Back to Benefits of Strength Training on Strength and Power Gains in Older Adults

Cindy K. Girouard and Ben F. Hurley, Exercise Science Laboratory, Dept. of Kinesiology, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.


Thirty-one untrained men aged 50-7 4 years were studied to compare the effects of 3 different programs on shoulder and hip range of motion. 14 subjects performed strength and flexibility training, 10 subjects performed flexibility only training, and 7 subjects performed no training as inactive controls. The strength & flexibility program included a 3-minute warm-up, approximately 30 minutes of heavy strength training, and about 10 minutes of static stretches both before and after the strength training. The flexibility only program omitted the strength training but consisted of the identical warm-up and stretching exercises used in the strength & flexibility program. Shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, and hip flexion were measured in all groups before and after the training period. In addition, aerobic capacity, percent body fat, and muscular strength were assessed before and after in the strength & flexibility group.


The strength & flexibility training resulted in a decline in percent body fat and a small increase in aerobic capacity. It also increased strength by ≈ 44% Increases in shoulder abduction (5%) were significantly less than improvements observed with flexibility only training (15%). Shoulder range of motion increases of 9.8% in the strength & flexibility group were less than the 12% observed in the flexibility only group. Hip flexion improved significantly (15%) with flexibility only training but not with strength & flexibility training. There were no significant differences among groups for shoulder flexion, and no significant changes in range of motion in any of the areas tested in the controls.


Strength and flexibility training programs are not as effective as flexibility training alone for improving joint range of motion. Therefore, if the goal is only to increase range of motion, then flexibility training alone will accomplish this goal more effectively than strength training combined with flexibility training. However, strength and flexibility training did not result in a decline in range of motion, in fact provided modest improvements. The strength & flexibility program also provided additional benefits such as reduction in body fat and increased strength.

Keiser Equipment Used

Leg press, chest press, leg curl, leg extension, lat pull down, shoulder press, upper back, hip abductor, triceps and abdominal machines.

Published in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Copyright 1995, American College of Sports Medicine. The following studies also document substantial strength gains (from 37-113%) due to strength training; numbers 1 & 3 -Body Composition, 5 & 7 -Bone Density, 10 & 12 -Chromium Supplementation, 13 & 14 -Chronic Conditions, 17 thru 21 -Diabetes, 22 thru 24 -Hormonal Responses, 26 & 27 -Muscle Injury, 28 & 29 Physical Frailty, 31 -Depression, and 37 -"Other" .

The following studies also document substantial strength gains (from 37-113%) due to strength training; numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, and 37.

Link to Original Research

About the author

Ty Sevin

Director of Human Performance, Education and Research

Articles by Ty Sevin >

With over 25 years of coaching experience at both the collegiate and Olympic levels, Ty Sevin is one of the most influential track and field coaches in the country. Ty has worked for the United States Olympic Committee, serving as the Director of the Track and Field Residency Program at the USOC Olympic Training Center in Chula Vista, CA. He has also served as an assistant coach for Team USA on three separate occasions, for both the men’s and women’s teams. Ty himself was a four-time U.S. Olympics Trials qualifier in javelin. Ty most recently spent four years as the Associate Head Coach at the University of Texas at Austin for both the men’s and women’s track and field teams. Prior to that, he led the men’s and women’s track and cross-country teams at the University of New Orleans and McNeese State.

Currently, Ty applies his vast industry experience to the role of Director of Human Performance, Research and Education for Keiser Corporation, where he consults with college and professional sports teams regarding the utilization of Keiser strength equipment. He is also responsible for creating educational curriculum relating to human performance and overseeing Keiser research projects